The Gun- Control Debate Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The sub- Control Debate - Essay ExampleA mortal feels a lot safe when he is in custody of a small weapon for his ad hominem protection. These people acc habituated the other side of politicizing this shooting issue. Therefore, in that respect is an ongoing heated debate around the country. The proponents of gun control point out to the consequences of lax measures, whereas the opponents of gun control point to the constitutional proper(ip) of possessing arms and ammunition. The Dishonest Gun- Control Debate Kevin Williamson in The Dishonest Gun- Control Debate has appealed to both the view and the emotions of the American people. The goal of this author is to entice the audience that the gun control debate is unfair and corrupt. Williamson states several(prenominal) rational arguments to put forward his point of view that the debate is deceitful. He argues that there is no association between guns and crime rate and puts down several facts and figures as well as comparisons between countries. Statistics exhibition that there is no correlation between guns and crime committed. There are places in the world where there are huge stockpiles of guns but no crimes, others where there are fewer guns and still less crime. Likewise, he mentions a research study by Zack Beauchamp to point out the tactics used by the politicians to insure the gun violence statistics. Through this, he has tried to appeal to the better sense of the American people. The source has made an excellent use of some of the rhetoric devices to persuade the audience to his point of view. When the writer states, We perceive a lot about gun deaths in the United States, but we hear less a good deal the fact that the great majority of those deaths are suicides, he made effective use of antanagoge- criticizing and complimenting together to change magnitude the impact of the point. The writer has made an impressive use of epithet- a describing adjective- to appeal to the audiences emotions. Similarly, Williamson has mentioned an anecdote from his personal disembodied spirit to provide his perspective on the debate. He states that he lived years in one of the most piano crime riddled area of New York however, he never became a victim despite travelling late at nights. The author has made use a vibrant tone in his article. He has used some of the authoritative words and phrases to illustrate the grim of the debate. At the same time, the author has hold an eloquent structure of writing where opinions, facts and illustrations are presented in a coherent manner. Nonetheless, Williamson has lacked in the effective fashion of pathos and clearly failed to appeal to the emotions of the people. However, Williamson has, overall, made an effective use of the rhetoric devices to appeal to the sense of the people. The Gun Debate is a heathenish Debate Trevor Burrus in The Gun Control Debate is a Cultural Debate argues that the gun issue has always been a cultural issue. One c ulture argues that gun possession leads to violence while the other follows that gun possession promotes safety. Therefore, the author in this article has tried to convince the people about the presence of cultural divide on this issue through logical cogitate as well as appealing to the community beliefs and attitudes. The writer has tried to make effective use of anecdote, epithet, appositive, apostrophe and logos to persuade the audience to his point of view. However, the logical reasoning