Thursday, March 28, 2019
To the Editor :: Weapons Mass Destruction War Essays
To the  editor in chief            There is I1 no proof of weapons of weapons of mass destruction, and  unretentive substantial  proof that Saddam Hussein Supported Al Qaeda.  For the last  course and  unity half, George W. Bush and his administration have told us about Iraqs  large production of  biologic weapons and how Iraq was supporting Al Qaeda, but wheres the proof.  I2 The  cardinal main reasons the United States invaded Iraq were because, of stock piles of weapons and Saddam Husseins link to Al Qaeda .              Lets start with the weapons of mass destruction.  There were I3  some(prenominal) satellite photos showing  mental synthesiss that were  pretend to be making chemicals for germ  state of war and  new(prenominal) various chemical weapons.  These photos show only buildings and no other proof that Iraq was making these bombs.  The U.S. still had the United Nations weapons inspectors investigate these findings and report them to the  certification Council.  The U.N.s    Chief weapons inspector Hans Blix Reported there was  non  pregnant evidence from ariel photos to prove there were any chemical weapons.  Hans Blix said himself, If I had solid evidence that Iraq retained weapons of mass destruction or were constructing  such weapons I would have taken it to the Security Council.  Shortly after these findings were reported,  chairman Bush prepared a speech accusing Baghdad of building such weapons.  This shows before the U.S. even went to war in Iraq , there was little to no evidence to invade Iraq, at least because of weapons of mass destruction.  I4             To this date, the U.S. has not found any substantial evidence to support its I5 actions in Iraq.  In April of 2003 shortly after the invasion started, semi trailers were seized near Baghdad.  The trailers were suspected to be portable labs to produce biological warfare agents.  The trailers and their contents were  soon tested to see weather they had any of the five main biological warfare    agents.  All tests were returned negative of these chemical agents.  As this shows, there is I6 no proof of weapons of mass destruction, even after the U.S. had invaded and occupied Iraq for the last year and a half.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.