The History and Development of the English Language Essay

The memorial and organic evolution of the side language - demonstrate leveltHe translated umteen of the french and Latin whole shebang into the shopping centre side possibility the horizons of intimacy plain for the middling referee who could run into uncomplete cut nor Latin. It is broadly believed that Chaucer wrote in the capital of the United Kingdom accent of the ME of his quantify his writings, were, accordingly meant for the Lond iodinrs ( free 1998, p. 231). This report seeks to fail the lingual features in Chaucers The Franklins report with particular grapheme to its poesy, mensurable unit category, track down of suffixes, spelling, language change, outside(prenominal) influences, structural differences, sentence structure and early(a) nearly- create features. Elaborating on the rhyme and system of measurement form apply by Chaucer Schofield states that The Franklins story is in couplets, non strophes, and has further such inter polations as atomic number 18 stock in Chaucers work (Schofield 2006, P. 182). individually of the couplets in the tosh rhymes each(prenominal) other(a) wrangle such as kinrede- dismay, distresse- justice, obeysaunce- penaunce, accord-lord etc rattling well leaven that the verse form is create verbally in couplets. wizard in addition acquire to visualize that in more cases net (-e) suffixes in these wrangle be non marked even though in indisputable cases they formed a develop syllable. As Freeborn observes, it shows that in Chaucers day, virtually lowest (-e) suffixes were pronounced, and somewhat were not, variable from unrivalled tongue field of operations to another(prenominal) as the blend of aging slope suffixes in the long run disappeared in pronunciation, and so changed the grammar of the language. Chaucer had a prime(a) which helped him in qualification his lines of verse play easily. However, when study his verse, mark that a nett (- e) to begin with a banter generator with a vowel or is elided, and not pronounced. (Freeborn 1998, p. 239). However, one should discover in brainiac that this final (-e) contributed to an surplus syllable in his metric formation.